Scott Peterson's family maintains a Web site that tries to counter the evidence against him. It's well-done, but I don't think anyone is buying what they are selling.
They also have a blog.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Gael Fashingbauer Cooper
- I'm an entertainment editor at MSNBC.com, and have maintained Pop Culture Junk Mail since August, 1999. The New York Times called the site "one of the best places to explore pop culture online," and Entertainment Weekly included it on their Top 100 Web Sites list. If you like weird food, strange products, and 1970s and 1980s nostalgia, PCJM is your home away from home.
I have a brand new BOOK, written with Brian Bellmont. "Whatever Happened to Pudding Pops? The Lost Toys, Tastes and Trends of the '70s and '80s." Buy it online, and follow our retro reminiscing on our GenXtinct blog, Facebook, and Twitter.
1 comment:
It's well-done, but I don't think anyone is buying what they are selling.
You are almost correct. About 2% of the population, that portion which thinks for themselves, have vigorously and vociferously pointed out the total lack of evidence of guilt for Peterson and the mountain of evidence for another suspect.
The other 98% has unthinkingly swallowed the oh so seductive party line that "It's ALWAYS the husband". It isn't.
Look at
Guilty?
to see what the prosecution had - which was nonsense.
Then look at
Innocent!
to see what the real circumstantial evidence in this case actually proved. 18 items of evidence for fetal abduction. Zero for uxoricide.
Post a Comment